The Obama administration seems absolutely determined to help
radical Islamic jihadists that have beheaded Christians,
that have massacred entire
Christian villages, and that have pledged loyalty to al-Qaeda topple the Assad regime and take over
Syria. Yes, the Assad regime is horrible, but if these jihadist lunatics
take control it will destabilize the entire region, make the prospect of a
major regional war much more probable, and plunge the entire nation of Syria
into a complete and utter nightmare. It has been estimated that somewhere
around 100,000 people have already been killed in the civil war in Syria, and
now it looks like the U.S. military and the rest of NATO plan to become
directly involved in the conflict. The Obama administration is actually
considering an attack on Syria even though the American people are
overwhelmingly against it, Obama does not have Congressional approval to start
a war, and he will never get approval for military action from the UN because
it will be blocked by Russia. This is setting up to
become a colossal foreign policy disaster for the United States.
A potential war with Syria has been brought to the forefront
because of a chemical weapons attack near Damascus last week that killed as
many as 1,400 people. The Obama administration and several other western
nations are blaming this attack on the Assad regime.
But others are pointing out that it would make absolutely no sense
for the Assad regime to do such a thing. They appear to be winning the
civil war, and Assad knows that Obama has previously said that the use of
chemical weapons in Syria would be a "red line" for the United
States.
So why would the Assad regime launch a brutal chemical weapons
attack against women and children just miles from where UN inspectors were
staying?
Why would Assad risk war with the United States and the rest of
NATO?
Assad would have to be extremely stupid or extremely suicidal to
do such a thing.
The ones that benefit from this chemical weapons attack are the
jihadist rebels. The odds of foreign intervention in the conflict just
went way, way up.
We will probably never learn the real truth about who was actually
behind that attack. And even if it had not happened, the U.S. and the
rest of NATO would have probably come up with another justification to go to
war anyway. They appear absolutely obsessed with getting rid of Assad,
but they have not really thought through the consequences.
The following are 15 signs that Obama has already made the
decision to go to war with Syria...
#1 Syria has
agreed to allow UN officials to inspect the site of the recent chemical weapons
attack that killed up to 1,400 people, but a "senior U.S. official"
says that such an inspection would be "too late to be credible".
#2 According
to ABC News, the White House is saying
that there is "very little doubt" that the Assad regime was behind
the deadly chemical weapons attack last week.
#3 Four U.S.
warships with ballistic missiles are moving into positionin
the eastern Mediterranean Sea. If the command is given, they will be able to
rain Tomahawk cruise missiles down on targets inside Syria within minutes...
U.S. defense officials told The Associated Press that the Navy
had sent a fourth warship armed with ballistic missiles into the eastern
Mediterranean Sea but without immediate orders for any missile launch into
Syria.
U.S. Navy ships are capable of a variety of military actions,
including launching Tomahawk cruise missiles, as they did against Libya in 2011
as part of an international action that led to the overthrow of the Libyan
government.
#4 CBS News is reporting that "the Pentagon is making the
initial preparations for a Cruise missile attack on Syrian government
forces".
#5 On
Saturday, Barack Obama met with his
national security teamto discuss what actions should be taken in
Syria.
#6 U.S.
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel says that Barack Obama has asked him to "prepare options
for all contingencies" as far as a conflict with Syria is
concerned.
#7 After a
phone conversation with British Prime Minister David Cameron about the
situation in Syria, the White House announced that both leaders expressed
"grave concern" about the chemical
weapons attack that took place last week.
#8 Military
commanders from the United States, Britain, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey,
France, Italy and Canada are meeting in Amman, Jordan on Sunday to coordinate plans for upcoming
attacks on Syria.
#9 According
to France’s second largest newspaper, rebel forces that have been trained by
the CIA have been pouring toward Damascus "since mid-August"...
According to our information, the regime's opponents, supervised
by Jordanian, Israeli and American commandos moving towards Damascus since
mid-August. This attack could explain the possible use of the Syrian president
to chemical weapons.
According to information obtained by Le Figaro , the first
trained in guerrilla warfare by the Americans in Jordan Syrian troops
reportedly entered into action since mid-August in southern Syria, in the
region of Deraa. A first group of 300 men, probably supported by Israeli and
Jordanian commandos, as well as men of the CIA, had crossed the border on
August 17. A second would have joined the 19. According to military sources,
the Americans, who do not want to put troops on the Syrian soil or arming
rebels in part controlled by radical Islamists form quietly for several months
in a training camp set up at the border Jordanian- Syrian fighters ASL, the
Free Syrian Army, handpicked.
#10 The U.S.
military moved a significant number of F-16 fighter jets to Jordan earlier this
year for military exercises, and kept them there afterward "at the request
of the Jordanian government".
#11 According
to a government document that Wikileaks released back in March 2012, NATO
personnel have been on the ground inside Syria preparing for regime change since 2011.
#12 The Times
of Israel is reporting that an internal military assessment
has concluded that "Washington is seriously considering a limited yet
effective attack that will make it clear to the regime in Damascus that the
international community will not tolerate the use of weapons of mass
destruction against Syrian civilians or any other elements".
#13 U.S. Senator John McCain recently said that if the U.S.
military does not hit Syria, it will be like "writing a blank check to
other brutal dictators around the world if they want to use chemical
weapons".
#14 According
to the New York Times,
"the air war in as a possible blueprint for acting without a mandate
from the United Nations".
#15 The White
House has released a statement that says that the Obama administration has no
plans to put "boots on the ground",
but it did not rule out any other types of military action.
This is not a conflict that the U.S. military should be involved
in.
And we should especially not be on the side of the rabidly
anti-Christian, rabidly anti-Israel and rabidly anti-western forces that are
attempting to take control of Syria.
The terrorists that the Obama administration is backing are
absolutely psychotic. Just check out the following example from a recent
article posted on the Blaze...
New video posted on YouTube purports to show the graphic murder
– execution style – of three Syrian truck drivers who did nothing more than
belong to a minority faith the local Al Qaeda affiliate does not like.
In the video, a small band of Islamist radicals with the Al
Qaeda-linked ISIS (Islamic State in Iraq and Syria) group is seen waving the
tractor trailers off the side of an Iraqi road and then proceeds to interrogate
the unsuspecting drivers about their prayer habits, trying to discover if they
are Sunnis or members of the Alawite minority in Syria.
When they “fail” the Sunni jihadis’ pop roadside quiz, the truck
drivers are seated in a line in the median of the road and shot in the back of
their heads firing squad style by the self-appointed law enforcers, jury, judge
and executioner.
Why in the world would the United States want to arm such people?
Why in the world would the United States want to go to war to help
such people take power?
It is utter insanity.
And as I mentioned earlier, most Americans are totally against
getting involved. According to a stunning new poll, 60
percent of all Americans are against U.S. military intervention in Syria, and
only 9 percent are in favor of it.
So in light of all that you have just read, why is the Obama
administration so determined to help the rebels in Syria?
7 Countries in 5 years
